Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
New South Wales
Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Korkmazer [1999] NSWCCA 454
FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60350/98
HEARING DATE(S) : 6/12/99
JUDGMENT DATE :
6 December 1999
PARTIES : Regina
Yilmaz Korkmazer
JUDGMENT OF : Fitzgerald JA; Newman J; Greg James J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/21/0098
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Woods DCJ
COUNSEL : M . Ierace SC (Appellant)
C.K. Maxwell QC (Respondent)
SOLICITORS : T.A. Murphy (Appellant)
S.E. O'Connor (Respondent)
CATCHWORDS :
ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1900
DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; Appeal upheld; Conviction and sentence quashed
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
CCA 60350/98
DC 98/21/0098
FITZGERALD JA
NEWMAN J
GREG JAMES J
MONDAY 6 DECEMBER 1999
REGINA v Yilmaz KORKMAZER
JUDGMENT
1 FITZGERALD JA: Concessions frankly made by the prosecution illustrate that this proceeding has been attended with insufficient care in the Local Court and the District Court and has miscarried.
2 Shortly stated, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced for an offence against s 33 of the Crimes Act 1900, whereas at most he pleaded guilty to an offence against s 35 of that Act or that is, at the very least, an arguable position.
3 Accordingly, the parties are agreed that the appropriate course is that leave to appeal should be granted, the appeal upheld, the conviction and sentence quashed and the proceeding before the justice or justices at which the appellant pleaded guilty be continued, at a time and place to be specified by the magistrate who conducted the committal proceeding on 25 February 1998 or, failing that, by the Chief Magistrate.
**********
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.