NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : BIRSE & ANOR. v. ARISTOCRAT LEISURE INDUSTRIES PTY. LIMITED & ORS. [2000] NSWCA 311 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40284/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/10/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 November 2000
KEITH SCOTT BIRSE and ENA BIRSE (Appellants) PARTIES : ARISTOCRAT LEISURE INDUSTRIES PTY. LIMITED (First Respondent) AMW PROJECTS PTY. LIMITED (Second Respondent) SHAW'S DARWIN TRANSPORT PTY. LIMITED (Third Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1; Giles JA at 49; Rolfe AJA at 50
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 2568/97; DC 4331/97; DC 6014/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Armitage DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
D.F. Jackson QC/A.M. Gruzman (Appellants) COUNSEL : N.A. (First and Second Respondents) I.G. Harrison SC/G. Curtin (Third Respondent) Keddies (Appellants) SOLICITORS : N.A. (First and Second Respoondents) Sparke Helmore (Third Respondent) CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - Motor vehicle accident - Car towing turning right across path of overtaking road train - Whether driver of car negligent in circumstances - Whether driver of road train negligent in circumstances - No question of principle ND DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40284/99 DC 2568/97 DC 4331/97 DC 6014/97 POWELL JA GILES JA ROLFE AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate