NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : R v R Salama [1999] NSWCCA 105 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60205/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 April 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 May 1999
PARTIES : Regina Ray Salama JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Ireland J at 2; Kirby J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Shillington DCJ
COUNSEL : G Nicholson QC L M B Lamprati SOLICITORS : Ellis & Baxter S E O'Connor CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE; Inconsistent verdicts; Warning to Jury; Question by Jury unanswered prior to verdict Crimes Act 1900 ACTS CITED : Evidence Act 1995 s165 Jury Act 1977 s55E Peacock v R (1912) 13 CLR 619 Mackenzie v R (1996) 71 ALJR 91 at 100 R v Crisologo (CCA, unreported, 12/12/97) CASES CITED: Jones v R (1997) 191 CLR 439 at 453 Mourani v Jeldi Manufacturing Pty Ltd (1983) 53 ALJR 825Lee v R (1998) 72 ALJR 1484 at 1487 Ratten v R (1972) AC 378 Robinson v R (1991) 55 A Crim R 318 DECISION : Appeal allowed
IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL
NO. 60205/98 WOOD CJ at CL IRELAND J DAVID KIRBY J
Monday 10 May 1999
Regina v Ray SALAMA
JUDGMENT
1 WOOD CJ at CL: I have had the advantage of reading in draft the reasons for judgment of David Kirby J. I agree with his reasons and the orders he proposes. **********
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60205/98
WOOD CJ at CL IRELAND J DAVID KIRBY J
Monday 10 May, 1999 REGINA -v- Ray SALAMA
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate