NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Votraint No. 708 Pty Limited and Anor v Davano Pty Limited and 2 Ors [2000] NSWCA 40 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40911/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 March 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 2000
Votraint No. 708 Pty Limited (First Appellant) Andrew Peter Dimitropoulos (Second Appellant) PARTIES : v Davano Pty Limited (First Respondent) David Christopher Biviano (Second Respondent) Stefano Spesaro (Third Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Stein JA at 1; Meagher JA at 9; Giles JA at 10
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 8562/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Balla ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C R Newlinds (Appellants) R W Tregenza (Respondents) SOLICITORS : The Law Partnership (Appellants) Emmerson & Emmerson (Respondents) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - representation as to takings - misleading and deceptive conduct - reliance LEGISLATION CITED : n/a CASES CITED: n/a DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40911/99 MEAGHER JA STEIN JA GILES JA Friday, 10 March 2000 VOTRAINT NO. 708 PTY LIMITED AND ANOR v DAVANO PTY LIMITED AND 2 ORS JUDGMENT
1 STEIN JA: This is an appeal from a decision of her Honour Acting District Court Judge Balla given on 12 November 1999. It concerns the purchase of a coffee bar business in Margaret Street, Sydney. There are essentially three points taken on the appeal by the first appellant, Votraint No. 708 Pty Limited and Mr Dimitropoulos, the second appellant. 2 The issues raised are:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate