NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v MARSH [2000] NSWCCA 370 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60092/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 September 2000
PARTIES : Regina Russell Alexander Marsh JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Newman J at 2; Adams J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/21/0284; 97/21/0162 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Holt DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : L Flannery (Appellant) D C Frearson (Crown) SOLICITORS : Taylor & Scott (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - criminal trial - physical and sexual assault - "relationship evidence" - evidence should not have been admitted - EVIDENCE - criminal trial - physical and sexual assault - exclusion of evidence - Evidence Act 1995, s108(3)(b) - CRIMINAL LAW - trial - role of counsel LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Rules Evidence Act 1995 B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 R v Abusafiah (1991) 24 NSWLR 531 R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 CASES CITED: R v Clarke (1995) 78 A Crim R 226 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Harvey (Supreme Court of NSW, Court of Criminal Appeal, 11 December 1996, unreported) R v Meier (Supreme Court of NSW, Court of Criminal Appeal, 21 May 1996, unreported) R v MM [2000] NSWCCA 78 R v Tripodina (1988) 35 A Crim R 183 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; convictions quashed; new trial ordered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate