NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : A Smith v K G Boston & 2 Ors [1999] NSWSC 1116 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Administrative Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 30028/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 November 1999
(Plaintiff) Andrew Smith v PARTIES : (First Defendant) Kenneth George Boston (Second Defendant) Gillian Shadwick (Third Defendant) George Green JUDGMENT OF : Sperling J
COUNSEL : (Plaintiff): C A Porter QC/J Needham (First, second & third Defendants): Mr P Menzies QC/S Dowling SOLICITORS : (Plaintiff): MacMahon Associates (First, second & third Defendants): A Murphy CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - whether disciplinary proceedings should be stayed for abuse of process as vexatious - whether proceedings sought to litigate anew a case disposed of by earlier proceedings - prior determination necessary - discretionary considerations, including public interest in proceedings going on - prior determination necessary for res judicata, issue estoppel, and Anshun estoppel. Teaching Services Act 1980 ACTS CITED : Government and Related Employees Appeal Tribunal Act 1980 Industrial Relations Act 1991 CASES CITED : Blair v Curran (1939-1940) 62 CLR 464; D A Christie Pty Ltd v Baker [1996] 2 VR 582; Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23; Maganja v Arthur [1984] 3 NSWLR 561; Walton v Gardiner (1992-1993) 177 CLR 378 DECISION : Summons dismissed; Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DIVISION
SPERLING J Friday, 19 November 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate