NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Taylor Farms (Aust) Pty Ltd v A Calkos Pty Ltd & Ors [No 1] [1999] NSWSC 363 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Admin Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 30048/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/02/99, 12/02/99, 16/04/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 April 1999
Taylor Farms (Australia) Pty Limited (Pl) PARTIES : A Calkos Pty Limited (1 Def) Union International (NSW) Pty Ltd (2 Def) Commercial Tribunal of NSW (3 Def) JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Commercial Tribunal of NSW LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 1089/97 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Deputy Chairman Hoeben
COUNSEL : M S M White (Pl) Dr R J Desiatnik (Defs) S Barton Adams & Co (Pl) SOLICITORS : Astley Thompson & Valtas (1 Def) Blake Dawson Waldron (2 Def) Stephen H Montgomery (3 Def) CATCHWORDS : Jurisdiction of Commercial Tribunal re damages; Fair Trading Act 1987, and defence of promissory estoppel; Application of Retail Leases Act 1994 to assignment of lease; Costs Supreme Court Act ACTS CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 Retail Leases Act 1994 CASES CITED : Waters v P C Henderson (Aust) P/L (C of A, unreported, 6 July 1994) Hughes v West Australian Cricket Association Inc (1986) ATPR 40-748 DECISION : See para 25
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
KIRBY J
Friday 16 April 1999
30048/98 - Taylor Farms (Australia) Pty Ltd v A Calkos Pty Ltd & Ors [No 1]
JUDGMENT (re costs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate