NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : MAHLO & ORS v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION LTD [1999] NSWCA 358 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40740/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 June 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 October 1999
John Walter Mahlo, Beverley Annie Mahlo, Wade Walter Mahlo, Brett John Mahlo, Mahlo Trading Pty Limited, Linden Holdings Pty Limited - Appellants PARTIES : Westpac Banking Corporation Limited - First Respondent Jack Crumlin - Second Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Mason P at 25; Sheller JA at 26
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 1406/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Santow J
COUNSEL : P T Taylor - Appellants S D Rares SC/P J Dowdy - Respondents SOLICITORS : Fisher Grogan - Appellants Henry Davis York - Respondents CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - negligent missstatement - loan contract - economic loss - whether there was inducement and reliance; TRADE PRACTICES - loan contract - misleading or deceptive conduct; PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - costs - cross-claim - separate action - Court cannot order costs against person not party to the cross-claim ACTS CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 Contracts Review Act 1980 Amon v Bobbett [1889] 22 QBD 543 Atlas Metal Co v Miller [1898] 2 QB 500 Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Limited v The Dredge 'Willemstad' (1976) 136 CLR 529 Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Dominelli Ford (Hurstville) Pty Limited v Karmot Auto Spares Pty Limited (1991) 38 FCR 471 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Grapulin v Cartons & Corrugated Papers Pty Limited (1961) SR (NSW) 348 Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159 CASES CITED: Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Limited v International Pools Australia Limited (1995) 36 NSWLR 242 Medway Oil and Storage Company Limited v Continental Contractors Limited [1929] AC 88 Millican v Tucker [1980] 1 WLR 651 Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398 Perre v Apand Pty Limited (1999) HCA 36 Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 Riochet Pty Limited v Equity Trustees (1993) 41 FCR 229 at 234 San Sebastian Pty Limited v The Minister (1986) 162 CLR 340 The King v Murray & Cormie (1916) 22 CLR 437 DECISION : 1. The plaintiffs' appeal against the order that Brett Mahlo pay any part of the costs of the cross-claim be allowed but otherwise the appeal be dismissed; 2. Set aside order 14 made by Santow J on 6 February 1998 and in lieu thereof order; "14. That the plaintiffs pay the first defendant's costs of the plaintiffs' claim against the first defendant including reserved costs on a solicitor and own client basis and the cross-defendants pay the cross-claimant's costs of the cross-claim on a solicitor and own client basis including reserved costs. "; 3. The appellants to pay four-fifths of the respondent's costs of the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate