NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Commercial Union Workers' Compensation (NSW) Limited v Gayl Lynette Clayton & Ors [2000] NSWCA 283 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40984/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 October 2000
Commercial Union Workers' Compensation (NSW) Limited (Appellant) PARTIES : Gayl Lynette Clayton (First Respondent) Trevor Michael Botfield (Second Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1; Stein JA at 2; Fitzgerald JA at 33
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Compensation Court LOWER COURT CC 8086/95 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Hughes J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
J D Hislop QC/R B Page (Appellant) COUNSEL : R S Toner SC/J P Berwick (First Respondent) R A Johnson (Second Respondent) Dexter Healey (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Bell & Johnson (First Respondent) H G Palmer & Co (Second Respondent) CATCHWORDS : WORKERS COMPENSATION - master and servant relationship - worker - cross-examination on credit post injury - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, s 103 CASES CITED: Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Hill v Green (1999) 48 NSWLR 161 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40984/99 CC 8086/95 POWELL JA STEIN JA FITZGERALD JA Wednesday, 18 October 2000 COMMERCIAL UNION WORKERS' COMPENSATION (NSW) LIMITED v Gayl Lynette CLAYTON & ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate