NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Crump v Sharah [1999] NSWSC 884 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 19516/93 HEARING DATE(S) : 28-29 June 1999, 1 July 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 September 1999
Vanessa Anne Crump (Plaintiff) v PARTIES : Gregory Joseph Sharah t/as Sharah Henville & Co (First Defendant) Garry Francis Henville t/as Sharah Henville & Co (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Davies AJ
COUNSEL : P - Mr P W Neil SC, Mr J B Clyne Ds - Mrs L McCallum SOLICITORS : P - G H Healey & Co Ds - Mallesons Stephen Jaques CATCHWORDS : Damages; professional negligence; assessment of damages where solicitor allowed claim to become statute-barred ACTS CITED : Dog Act 1966, s20 Johnson v Perez 166 CLR 351 Nikolaou v Papasavas, Phillips & Co 166 CLR 394 Phillips v Bisley (unrep, Court of Appeal, 18/3/97) Wyong Shire Council v Shirt 146 CLR 40 CASES CITED : Zappia v Allsop (unrep, Court of Appeal, 17/3/94) Eadie v Groombridge 16 MVR 263 Graham v Baker 106 CLR 340 MBP (SA) P/L v Gogic 171 CLR 657 Griffiths v Kerkemeyer 139 CLR 161 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon 176 CLR 344 DECISION : Judgment for plaintiff, see paras 70 and 71
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
DAVIES AJ
Thursday, 2 September 1999
19516/93 - CRUMP v SHARAH t/as G J SHARAH, HENVILLE & CO & ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate