NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : NSWCC v CROTTY & ANOR [1999] NSWSC 146 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 13179/94 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/2/99; 17/2/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 February 1999
NSW Crime Commission PARTIES : Barry Francis Crotty Jennifer Margaret Crotty JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJatCL
COUNSEL : I.D. Temby QC/N. Buscombe for Plaintiff Defendant in person SOLICITORS : J.M. Giorgiutti for Plaintiff Defendant in person CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - confiscation of criminal proceeds - assets acquired through involvement in serious crime-related activity involving indictable offence - standard of proof required by Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 to obtain orders for proceeds assessment and assets forfeiture. Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 ss 6 222 ACTS CITED : 25 27 28 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25 DECISION : (1) Assets forfeiture made in relation to residential property, subject to defendant's aplication for leave to exclude premises from the order;; (2) Proceeds assessment order in sum of $731,700; (3) Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs, including any reserved costs.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
No. 13179/94
WOOD CJ at CL
WEDNESDAY 17 FEBRUARY 1999 NEW SOUTH WALES CRIME COMMISSION v BARRY FRANCIS CROTTY & ANOR
Proceedings under the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 were brought by the New South Wales Crime Commission ("the Commission") against the defendant, in connection with his conviction of the offence of supply a prohibited drug under s 25(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985. The Commission sought a proceeds assessment order against the defendant, and an assets forfeiture order in respect of residential premises jointly owned by him and his wife.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate