NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Bar-Mordecai v Rotman & Ors [2000] NSWCA 123 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40568/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 - 9 December 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 May 2000
Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai (Appellant) PARTIES : Selma Rotman (1 Respondent) Alex Hillston (2 Respondent) Alan David James Hillston (3 Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Stein JA at 1; Giles JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT EQ 120009/94 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Einstein J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
In person (Appellant) COUNSEL : J B Whittle SC - (1/2/3 Respondents) B J Burke - (2/3 Respondents) Appellant - n/a SOLICITORS : Stewart Levitt & Co Solicitors (1 Respondent) Shaw McDonald (2/3 Respondents) CATCHWORDS : PROBATE - whether will revoked by tearing up - presumption as to revocation of will - renunciation of probate - existence of de facto relationship - revision of ex tempore judgment - bias - alleged perjury of witnesses - credibility of evidence - ND Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, LEGISLATION CITED : ss 17(3)(b), 32G, 61B(2), 61B(3A), 74(c)(i), 75(1)(a) Evidence Act 1995, s 128 De Facto Relationships Act 1984 Amadio Pty Ltd v Henderson (1998) 81 FLR 149 Australian Breeders Co-operative Society Ltd v Jones (1997) 150 ALR 488 Bromley v Bromley [1965] P 111 Finch v Finch (1867) LR 1 P & D 371 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 CASES CITED: Lam v Beesley (1992) 7 WAR 88 Loughnan v Altman (1992) 111 ALR 445 McCauley v McCauley (1910) 10 CLR 434 Roy v Sturgeon (1986) 11 NSWLR 454 Sudgen v Lord St Leonards (1876) LR 1 P & D 154 Taylor v Waters (Powell J, Supreme Court, 19 June 1992, unreported) Wentworth v Rares (Court of Appeal, 19 November 1990, unreported) DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate