NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v. MAGRIN & WATSON [2000] NSWCCA 346 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60157 of 2000; 60158 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 31 August 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 August 2000
PARTIES : REGINA v. MAGRIN, Gregory Allan REGINA v. WATSON Graeme Joseph JUDGMENT OF : Mason P; Levine J; Greg James J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/21/3306; 99/21/3038 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Ford, DCJ. OFFICER :
Crown: P.G. Berman COUNSEL : Magrin: M. Austin Watson: P.M. Winch Crown: S.E. O'Connor SOLICITORS : Magrin: Sydney Regional Aboriginal Corporation Legal Services Watson: Marsdens CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal - Crown appeals against asserted inadequacy of sentence considered - complicity in very serious assault - assistance in hiring assailant - injuries to victim not within contemplation of respondents - Regina v. Stokes & Difford applied - sentences not inadequate. LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes Act 1900 Griffiths (1997) 137 CLR 293 Everett (1994) 181 CLR 295 Allpass (1994) 72 A. Crim. R. 561 Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 CASES CITED: Cranssen (1936) 55 CLR 509 Histollo Pty. Limited v. Director-General of National Parks & Wildlife Service (CCA, unreported 10.12.98) Symonds (1995) 79 A. Crim. R. 31 Kurtic (1996) 85 A. Crim. R. 57 Stokes & Difford (1990) 51 A. Crim. R. 25 DECISION : In each case, appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate