NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Davies re Estate of Rose [1999] NSWSC 365 revised - 31/08/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Probate FILE NUMBER(S) : 110405 of 1998 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 April 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 1999
Elizabeth Mary Davies (First Applicant) PARTIES : John Gilchrist Campbell (Second Applicant) Estate of Philip Graeme Rose deceased JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr. P. Hallen SC (Applicants) SOLICITORS : Harris Wheeler (Applicants) CATCHWORDS : WILLS - Rectification - Wills Probate and Administration Act S29A DECISION : Rectification ordered
- 5 - THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES PROBATE DIVISION
WINDEYER J
MONDAY 12 APRIL 1999
110405/98 ELIZABETH MARY DAVIES & ANOR - THE ESTATE OF PHILIP GRAEME ROSE
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: The plaintiffs, who are the executors of the will of Philip Graeme Rose, deceased, who died on 22 February 1998 seek an order for rectification of the will of the deceased which is dated 17 August 1994. 2 Under that will, Mr Rose appointed Mrs Davis and Mr Campbell executors and then provided for the whole estate to go to them: "UPON TRUST for the following purposes:
(a) I DIRECT that my right title and interest in my property at 115 Hopetoun Avenue Vaucluse be sold and the proceeds thereof together with any other moneys of which I am possessed at my decease be divided equally between ELIZABETH MARY DAVIES and JOHN GILCHRIST CAMPBELL provided they survive me but in the event of either of them pre-deceasing me I DIRECT that the children of the deceased parent shall be entitled to the share of the deceased parent such children to share and share alike as tenants in common". 3 The deceased at his death held a one sixth interest in the property 115 Hopetoun Avenue, Vaucluse. He owned another property 7/85 Bronco Road Broadmeadow and he had monies in bank accounts of about $33,000 and debentures to the value of about $335,000. It is thus clear that on the will as it presently reads the Broadmeadow property and the debentures are assets which have not been disposed of by will and would therefore fall to be distributed on intestacy. 4 The evidence shows that there are no next of kin entitled on intestacy and, therefore, the whole of the undisclosed assets would go to the State as bona vacantia. 5 The deceased had been friendly with Mr and Mrs Campbell and Mrs Davies for many years. After his wife died he had spoken to them about his intentions so far as his will is concerned. He had said to Mr Campbell words to the effect: "I have come to the conclusion to leave the estate to Betty and yourself, Maurice and your family. The reason is that Betty has been a friend and companion for 15 years. Maurice and yourself have been my family." 6 Shortly after that, namely, 21 August 1994 Mr Campbell said that in a telephone conversation which took place as it always did on a Sunday evening the deceased said to him: I have made my will. It is as we discussed. I have made you and Betty the executors of the will. Mrs Campbell said that she spoke to the deceased on the same day and he said to her: I have been to see a solicitor. I have made a will leaving half to Betty and her family and half to you John and your family. It's a very simple will. And that he had also said: If you don't need to use it you can give it to the children. It goes to them on your death. 7. Mrs Davies said that she was having dinner with the deceased at her home one day, which she said was probably 17 August 1994, when he said: I have changed my will today. I have left everything to you and John in equal shares. If you die before me your share goes to your children and the same for John. How does that sound? 8. Mr Ruggero said that on 17 August the deceased, whom he had known for 40 years, came to his office and asked that a will be made for him straightaway. He said he wanted to make a will over the Sydney property. The significant part of his evidence appears in the second paragraph numbered 1 which should really be 2 as follows: I said to Phil, "What is your full name." He said "Philip Graeme Rose" and I said, "What is your address?" He said "Flat 2, 71 Tooke Street, Cooks Hill". I then commenced the will as shown in the copy annexed until I came down to the name of his executors. I said, "Who are to be your executors?" He replied "Elizabeth Mary Davies and John Gilchrist Campbell".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate