NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : POWERCELL PTY. LIMITED v. ROSARIO GRASSO AND 5 OTHERS [1999] NSWSC 1190 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 12564/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/12/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 1999
Powercell Pty. Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Rosario Grasso, Santo Grasso, Sandra Cannizzaro and Graziella Giacca (First Defendants) Cuzeno Pty. Limited (ACN 001 291 738) (Second Defendant) George Jabbour (Third Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ at 1
COUNSEL : C. Harris (Plaintiff) J. Armfield (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Willis & Bowring (Plaintiff) Nesci & Romano (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Measure of damages for anticipatory breach of contract for sale of land; mitigation DECISION : Extension of time in which to appeal and seek leave to apeal refused on the ground that the appeal has no merits; Leave to appeal to the extent that it is necessary is refused on the same basis; Application to set aside the statutory demand dismissed; Powercell is to pay the costs of the first defendants of the proceedings in this court. (For costs purposes it is noted that the proceedings inthis court on the hearing of the matters took 2½ hours on 2 December 1999); These orders not to be entered for 7 days
9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
No. 12564 of 1999
SMART AJ
7 December 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate