NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : R v Colby [1999] NSWCCA 261 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60587/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 1999
Regina PARTIES : v Robert Victor Colby JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Grove J at 217; Dunford J at 218
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 95/11/0865 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Kinchington DCJ
COUNSEL : A: SR Norrish QC R: WG Dawe QC SOLICITORS : A: TA Murphy R: SE O'Connor CATCHWORDS : APPEAL - Against conviction - Aggravated sexual assault (s61J Crimes Act) - Sexual intercourse with a person between 10 and 16 by person in authority (s66C(2) Crimes Act) - Whether verdict unsafe and unsatisfactory due to lack of evidentiary support; APPEAL - Against sentence - Whether total of sentences was manifestly excessive - Whether trial judge erred in considering broader context of offences - New sentence; EVIDENCE - Inadequate directions to jury regarding complaint evidence - Failure of trial judge to give adequate warnings in relation to evidence of the complainant - Admissibility of "coincidence" and "tendency" evidence of three former wives - Possibility of concoction - Whether misdirections and inadequate directions given in relation to evidence of former wives - Admissibility of evidence of a third party and whether probative - Admissibility of magazine to show knowledge of complainant of sexual matters - Admissibility of evidence of discharge of firearm to show propensity to act on impulse - Admissibility of finding of "not guilty" on sexual assault charges brought against complainant's father - Admissibility of certain specialist gynaecological evidence - Whether rejection of any or all of this evidence led to a miscarriage of justice - Whether probative value outweighed prejudicial effect Crimes Act 1900 ACTS CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Hoch v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 292 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 R v Pfennig (1995) 182 CLR 461 CASES CITED: Robertson (1997) 91 A Crim R 388 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 Gipp v The Queen (1988) 194 CLR 106 H (1994) 74 A Crim R 41 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence upheld; Sentence varied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate