NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 111 A Crim R 388
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v ROBINSON [2000] NSWCCA 59 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60328/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/03/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 March 2000
PARTIES : REGINA v Dennis Noel ROBINSON JUDGMENT OF : Fitzgerald JA at 1; Barr J at 12; Smart AJ at 80
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/41/0065; 98/21/2061 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Tupman DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: PG Berman Appellant: JS Stratton SOLICITORS : Crown: SE O'Connor Appellant: TA Murphy CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - whether verdicts of guilty consistent with verdicts of acquittal on other counts - whether verdicts 'merciful' - whether verdicts compromised - whether verdicts reasonable LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss 110, 112 R v PKS, Court of Criminal Appeal, 1.10.98, unrep. R v Hamilton (1993) 68 A Crim R 298. M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487. Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439. CASES CITED: MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348. R v Hunt [1968] 2 QB 433. R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591. Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44. R v Hauke, Court of Criminal Appeal, 27.3.95, unrep. R v Crisologo (1997) 99 A Crim R 178. DECISION : See para 79
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60328/98 DC 97/41/0065, 98/21/2061 FITZGERALD JA BARR J SMART AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate