NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] 46 NSWLR 267 [1999] 45 IPR 228
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : AUSTRALIAN CO-OPERATIVE FOODS v NORCO [1999] NSWSC 274 CURRENT JURISDICTION : EQUITY FILE NUMBER(S) : 4662/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 18-19 February 1999 1-2 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 March 1999
AUSTRALIAN CO-OPERATIVE FOODS LIMITED PARTIES : v NORCO CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
COUNSEL : PLAINTIFF: MR J IRELAND QC/MR S C BURLEY DEFENDANT: MR J J GARNSEY QC/Ms A H BOWNE SOLICITORS : PLAINTIFF: ADDISONS DEFENDANT: STONE & PARTNERS CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT; Construction; licence to use registered trade mark; discretion to grant or withhold approval of packaging; exercise of discretion; subject to implied term of honesty, reasonableness, good faith; decision to withhold approval to continue industry practice of co-branding; implied term not exceeded by decision.; ESTOPPEL; By convention; prior industry practice of co-branding of trade marks; claim that party estopped from refusing to grant approval under licence to continue to co-brand ; change of circumstances in industry known to party; no estoppel.; ESTOPPEL; pre-contractual representation; context of representations; subsequent written licence agreement; agreement intended to govern all rights; exercise of discretion pursuant to agreement; refusal to grant approval to continue prior practice of co-branding; no estoppel.; TRADE MARKS; TMA 1995 s24 - trade mark becomes descriptive after registration; subs88 (2) (c) - mark likely to deceive or cause confusion; attacks on registered trade marks failed on the facts; s87 rectification of Register of Trade Marks. Trade Marks Act 1905, s 114 ACTS CITED : Trade Marks Act 1955, s 25 (1), s 26, s 28 (a), (d).,s 61, s 71 (1), s 94, Trade Marks Act 1995, Division 2, Part 4, 5 , s 6, subs 7 (3), s 24, subs24 (1), (2), (3) and (4), s 25, s 41, s 57, subs 72 (1), subs 87 (1), (2), s 88, subs 88 (2) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), s 89, subs 233 (1), s 234. Trade Practices Act 1974 Alcatel Australia Limited v Scarcella & Ors (1998) 44 NSWLR 349. Australian Berlei Case (1973) 129 CLR 353 Johnson Matthey v A C Rochester Overseas Corporation (1990) 23 NSWLR 190. Murray Goulburn Co-operative Co. Limited v NSW Dairy Corporation & Anor (1990) 116 IPR 289. CASES CITED : NSW Dairy Corporation v Murray Goulburn Co-operative Company Limited (1991) 171 CLR 363. Pioneer Kabushiki Kaisha v Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137. Skywest Aviation Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (1995)126 FLR 61. Southern Cross Refrigerating Company v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 592 State Rail Authority (NSW) v Heath Outdoor Pty Ltd (1986) 7 NSWLR 170. Whittet v State Bank of NSW (1991) 24 NSWLR 146. DECISION : SEE PARAGRAPH 99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate