NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : REGINA v SUCKLING [1999] NSWCCA 36 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60495/96 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/06/98; 25/06/98; 06/11/98; 13/11/98 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 1999
PARTIES : Daryl Francis Suckling (appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) JUDGMENT OF : McInerney J at 1; Ireland J at 1; Adams J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70013/95 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Supreme Court
COUNSEL : Mr G Rowling (Crown) Mr S Norrish QC (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Voros & Associates (appellant) S E O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : Evidence Act 1995 ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Interpretation Act 1987 R v Singh Bal (1997) 92 A Crim R 397 R v Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52 R v Swaffield (1997-98) 151 ALR Pavic v R (1997-98) 151 ALR 98 Cleland (1982) 151 CLR 1 AT 18 BD (1994) A Crim R 131 Harriman v The Queen (1988-89) 167 CLR 590 CASES CITED: Makin v Attorney General (NSW) (1984) AC 57 Van der Meer (1988) 82 ALR 10 Pfennig v The Queen (1994-95) 182 CLR 461 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 610 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 1012 Gordon & Gordon (1991) 57 A Crim R 413 Blade (unreported CCA 1 May 1991) DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60495/96 McINERNEY J IRELAND J ADAMS J
Friday 15 March 1999 REGINA v DARYL FRANCIS SUCKLING JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate