NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Bulgin & Stockwell Pty Ltd v Reebok Australia Pty Ltd & Anor [1999] NSWCA 470 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40678/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/07/99, 30/07/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 December 1999
Bulgin & Stockwell Pty Ltd PARTIES : Reebok Australia Pty Ltd John Fletcher International JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Giles JA at 36; Hodgson CJinEq at 78
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 279/94 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Christie DCJ
Appellant: P M Jacobson QC/ K P Smark COUNSEL : Respondent: P E King/ K Hawes Second Respondent: M A Elkaim Appellant: Bruce & Stewart SOLICITORS : Respondent: Withnell & Co Second Respondent: Henry Davis York CATCHWORDS : Contract; Breach of contract; Carriage and storage of goods; Theft of goods; Liability; Damages; Exclusion clause; Standard terms of contract; Third party liability ACTS CITED : Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth) CASES CITED: University of Wollongong v Metwally (No2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40678/97 DC 279/94
BEAZLEY JA GILES JA HODGSON CJ in Eq
Friday, 17 December 1999
BULGIN & STOCKWELL PTY LIMITED v REEBOK AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & ANOR
FACTS
The appellant (Bulgin & Stockwell) is a customs agent. The first respondent (Reebok) is a sporting goods and clothing retailer and the second respondent (John Fletcher International) is a warehouse owner and operator who provides bonded warehouse facilities to importers.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate