NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : Regina v Moussad [1999] NSWCCA 337 revised - 29/10/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 060842/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 May 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 October 1999
PARTIES : Regina v Amani Moussad JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Bell J at 2; Smart AJ at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 95/21/0187 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Coleman DCJ
COUNSEL : Appellant; P J O'Donnell Respondent: C P O'Donnell Appellant: Matthews Dooley & Gibson SOLICITORS : Respondent: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions CATCHWORDS : Allegation of single criminal enterprise covering a number of offences permissible - Directions as to what constitutes an enterprise ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Johnson v Miller (1937-38) 59 CLR at 489 Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77 R v Hamzy (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 Merriman (1973) AC 584 Locchi (1991) 22 NSWLR 309 CASES CITED: R v Velardi NSWCCA, unreported, 24 May 1996 R v Trad & Younan NSWCCA, unreported, 19 February 1996 United States v Awan 5 December 1989 MD Fla, unreported F (1996) 90 A Crim R 356 R v Giam (1999) NSWCCA 53, unreported, 10 March 1999 Taylor v The Queen (1997) 93 A Crim R 1 Carcosa Pty Ltd v Czerwanin (1997) 93 A Crim R 287. DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60842/98
WOOD CJ at CL BELL J SMART AJ
Wednesday, 27 October 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate