NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 104 A Crim R 416
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : Regina v GIAM [1999] NSWCCA 53 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60318/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 1999
PARTIES : Appellant: Tony Giam Respondent: Regina JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Abadee J at 60; Adams J at 61
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/11/0065 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Judge McGuire
COUNSEL : Appellant: P Byrne SC Respondent: P G Ingram SOLICITORS : Appellant: Joanne Muller Respondent: S E O'Connor CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW; cheat and defraud as a director; s176A Crimes Act 1900; making a false statement with intent to obtain financial advantage; s178BB Crimes Act 1900; CRIMINAL LAW; indictment; duplicity; CRIMINAL LAW; "unsafe and unsatisfactory"; s5(1), s6(1), s6(2), s8(10 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes Act 1900 ACTS CITED : Interpretations Act 1987 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77 Stanton v Abernathy (1990) 19 NSWLR 656 Stanton v Abernathy (No 2) (1991) 53 ACrimR 241 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 CASES CITED: Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68; (1999) 73 ALJR 1; (1998) 158 ALR 379 R v Johnson NSWCCA 31 July 1998 Director of Public Prosecutions (Naru) v Fowler (1984) 154 CLR 627 King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 Ryan v R (1981) 149 CLR 1 DECISION : Appeal allowed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60318/98
SPIGELMAN CJ ABADEE J ADAMS J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate