NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 118 A Crim R 312
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Caradonna [2000] NSWCCA 398 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60111/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 October 2000
PARTIES : Regina (Appellant) Angelo Antonio Caradonna (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 33, 37 & 49; Dunford J at 1 & 39; Carruthers AJ at 36 & 48
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/11/3016 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Tupman DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : DG Staehli (Crown) G Stanton (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown / Appellant) Michael Jokovic (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal - defrauding the Commonwealth - 3 counts - need for general deterrence - periodic detention & home detention inadequate. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A, 20AB, 29D Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 6, 7, 76, 77 & 78 R v Morris (1992) 61 A Crim R 233 R v Whitnall (1993) 120 ALR 449 R v Wright (1994) 74 A Crim R 152 R v Nguyen and Pham (1996) 86 A Crim R 521 R v Ruggero (SASC - 1 December 1998) R v Kelvin [2000] NSWCCA 190 Director of Public Prosecutions v Hamman (CCA - 1 December 1998) CASES CITED: R v Stitt (1998) 102 A Crim R 428 R v Gentz [1999] NSWCCA 285 R v Hollocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Day (CCA - 23 April 1998) R v Byrne (CCA - 5 August 1998) R v Webster [1999] NSWCCA 313 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 DECISION : See paras 31 & 47
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate