NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Spanos Enterprises Pty Ltd & 2 Ors v South Sydney City Council [1999] NSWSC 1077 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 11633/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 October 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 November 1999
Spanos Enterprises Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff)
Spanos Export Meats Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) PARTIES : Anthony William Spanos (Third Plaintiff)
South Sydney City Council (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr J B de Vere Tyndall (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : Mr M J Walsh (Defendant) Tjakamarra Forrest Solicitors of Canberra (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : Pike Pike & Fenwick (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Appeal against decision of costs assessor; Extension of time ACTS CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) (as amended) - s 208L Kioa & Ors v West & Anor (1985) 159 CLR 550 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Chouman v Margules 17 MVR 144 CASES CITED : Dubow v Miller Goddard Solicitors (NSWSC, unreported 30 September, Marster Harrison) Smits v Buckworths (NSWSC, unreported 22 September 1997, Young J) Wentworth v Wentworth (NSWSC, unreported 6 February 1998, Santow J) Webb v Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41 at 53 Gibson v O'Keefe (NSWSC, unreported 2 June 1998, Einstein J) DECISION : See para 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate