NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : R v Gust [1999] NSWCCA 265 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60651 of 1997 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/07/1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 October 1999
PARTIES : Colin Alfred Gust (appellant) Regina (respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Hidden J at 25; Smart AJ at 62
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 96/31/0137 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Nader DCJ
COUNSEL : C. Bruce (appellant) C.K. Maxwell (Crown) SOLICITORS : Legal Aid Commission (appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - sexual assault - whether verdict unreasonable - directions on recklessness as to consent and complaint - whether warning about complainant's evidence required ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 R v Hemsley (1988) 36 ACrim R 334 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392 Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259 R v D (1996) 86 ACrim R 41 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Kitchener (1993) 29 NSWLR 696 CASES CITED: Tolmie (1996) 84 ACrim R 293 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 R v Lemura (CCA unreported 18 December 1998) Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37 R v Davis [1999] NSWCCA 15 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Zafiris (CCA unreported 14 September 1998) R v Vawdrey (CCA unreported 16 April 1998) DECISION : Appeal dismissed (by majority)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate