NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] 154 FLR 228 [1999] 25 Fam LR 476
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Damberg v Damberg [1999] NSWSC 1208 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 4736/99; 4737/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 December 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 1999
4736/99 Nicole Damberg (P) Wilfried Damberg (D1) Bruenhild Damberg (D2) PARTIES : 4737/99 Oliver Damberg (P) Wilfried Damberg (D1) Bruenhild Damberg (D2) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : G Casey (Sol) (P) M A Bradford (D) SOLICITORS : Garden & Montgomerie (P) Wilson Fardell & Moore (D) CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - property claims cross-vested to Family Court of Australia - ineffective judgment of Family Court in light of Re Wakim - procedure for application to Supreme Court for order for costs and for enforcement of Family Court's orders - requirements of Federal Courts (State Jurisdiction) Act 1999 (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79 ACTS CITED : Federal Courts (State Jurisdiction) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules, Pt 77, 139, 140, 141 CASES CITED : Re Wakim (1999) 163 ALR 270 DECISION : Summonses for declarations of right dismissed with no order for costs
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
AUSTIN J
TUESDAY 7 DECEMBER 1999
4736/99 - NICOLE DAMBERG v WILFRIED DAMBERG & BRUENHILD DAMBERG 4737/99 - OLIVER DAMBERG v WILFREID DAMBERG & BRUENHILD DAMBERG & 1 OR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate