NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 114 A Crim R 207
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v WAYNE RONALD BURRELL [2000] NSWCCA 262 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60006/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 May 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 July 2000
PARTIES : REGINA v WAYNE RONALD BURRELL JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sperling J at 43; Smart AJ at 44
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/11/1035 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Woods DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: C K Maxwell QC Respondent: A J Bellanto QC SOLICITORS : Crown: S E O'Connor Respondent: Michael Croke & Co CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - Crown appeal - hardship of custodial sentence to prisoner - hardship to family member - Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s25(1) and s25(2) - the medical condition of the accused - paraplegia bringing complications in day to day living arrangements - capacity of the Corrections Health Service to care properly for the accused - Executive's duty of care towards prisoners under its control. DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60006/00
MASON P SPERLING J SMART AJ
Friday 21 July 2000
REGINA v WAYNE RONALD BURRELL The respondent pleaded guilty to two counts on an indictment, namely for supply of a prohibited drug, methylamphetamine, not less than the commercial quantity; and for supply of a prohibited drug, cannabis leaf.
The sentencing judge recognised that the offences on their face called for a significant full time custodial sentence. Nevertheless, his Honour deferred passing sentence on the condition that the respondent enter a recognisance for himself in the sum of $5,000 to be of good behaviour for three years. His Honour also fined the respondent $3,000 on each count of the indictment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate