NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 120 A Crim R 42
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Dinh [2000] NSWCCA 536 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60665/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 November 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 December 2000
PARTIES : Crown - Respondent David Duy Thai DINH - Applicant JUDGMENT OF : Fitzgerald JA at 1; Simpson J at 5; Howie J at 5
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70059/99 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Dunford J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R Hulme - Crown David Duy Thai DINH - T Hoenig SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor - Crown D J Humphreys - Applicant Dinh
LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Middis (SC NSW Hunt J 17 March 1991) Baartman (NSWCCA 6 October 1994) R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Georgiou [1999] NSWCCA 125 R v Masters (1992) 26 NSWLR 450 at 146 R v Chai (1992) 27 NSWLR 153 at 191 R v Nguyen (CCA 23 September 1998) R v Saunders (1994) 72 A Crim R 347 CASES CITED: R v Van Phu Ho CCA(NSW) unreported, 18 July 1994 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 at 504-505 Alexandroaia v R (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 at 290 R v Steffan (1993) 30 NSWLR 633 R v Matovski (1989) 15 NSWLR 720 at 723 R v Wright (1990) 90 Cr App R 315 R v Bilick and Starke (1984) 11 A Crim R 452 at 462 Tripodi v R (1961) 104 CLR 1 at 7 Harriman v R (1989) 167 CLR 590 at 630 Wilson v R (1970) 123 CLR 334 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate