NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] Aust Torts Reports 81-562
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons [2000] NSWCA 53 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40550/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 March 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 March 2000
PARTIES : Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd (Appellant) Keith Parsons (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Stein JA at 1; Heydon JA at 2; Foster AJA at 55
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 283/96 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Taylor DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C Evatt/G Hansen (Appellant) T K Tobin QC/ T Molomby (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt (Appellant) McDonald Johnson (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Tort of injurious falsehood - improper motive - false, misleading, maliciously published material - disseminated by grapevine effect - natural and probable consequence of republication of false material - Patrick Nugawela v Reginald Crampton and Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (Supreme Court of NSW, Levine J, unreported, 31 January 1996) - no intent to injure without just cause or excuse - no actual damage or injury suffered by the plaintiff by reason of the malicious publication of false material - ND Kaye v Robinson [1991] FSR 62 The Royal Baking Powder Co v Wright, Crossley & Co. (1900) 18 RPC 95 CASES CITED: Ajello v Worsley [1898] 1 Ch 274 Ratcliffe v Evans [1892] 2 QB 524 George v Blow (1899) 20 NSWLR 395 DECISION : Appeal dismissed; the appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate