New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Wallin v Tiernan [1999] NSWCA 353 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40969/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 August 1999 PARTIES : Graham and Paula Wallin v Roderick Tiernan JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Sheller JA at 1; Davies AJA at 1 LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/32/0188; 97/32/0193; 98/32/0052 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Job DCJ COUNSEL : Appellant: self Respondent: self SOLICITORS : Appellant: self Respondent: self CATCHWORDS : Apprehended violence order - revocation by both parties - Court ought not intervene. DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs. - 1 - -THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA: 40969/98 MEAGHER JA STEIN JA DAVIES AJA Friday 20 August 1999 WALLIN v TIERNAN JUDGMENT 1 MEAGHER JA: The Claimant(s), Mr and Mrs Wallin, and the opponent Dr Tiernan, were next-door neighbours at Lake Macquarie. 2 Relations between them grew very sour when Dr Tiernan started to erect a house on his land; indeed, so sour that orders of apprehended violence were taken out before a Local Court, by Mrs Wallin and her son against Dr Tiernan, and by Dr Tiernan against Mrs Wallin. This was followed, almost simultaneously, by a settlement between the parties and by application to the District Court to revoke the Apprehended Violence Orders. These applications were heard before His Honour Judge Job, who in effect granted each application. 3 He found that neither side reasonably apprehended any violence from the other. 4 Application is now made by Mrs Wallin for leave to appeal against Judge Job's order. Such leave will be refused. This Court ought not be involved in petty wrangles between neighbours. 5 Summons dismissed with costs. DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.