NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Cameron v Vale - Estate of Leslie Braeside Arthur; Arthur v Vale - Estate of Leslie Braeside Arthur; Arthur v Vale - Estate of Leslie Braeside Arthur [1999] NSWSC 1125 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 3803/97; 1151/98; 1978/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 October 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 1999
3803/97 - Robyn Kathleen Cameron v John Vale - Estate of Leslie Braeside Arthur; PARTIES : 1151/98 - Robert Alfred Arthur v John Vale - Estate of Leslie Braeside Arthur; 1978/98 - Philip James Patrick Arthur v John Vale - Estate of Leslie Braeside Arthur JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry
3801/97 Mr B Sharpe (Plaintiff) Mr A Lucas (Defendant)
1151/98 Mr R Tonner COUNSEL : (Plaintiff) Mr A Lucas (Defendant)
1978/98 Mr J Wilson (Plaintiff) Mr A Lucas (Defendant) 3803/97 Harpers (Plaintiff)
1151/98 Stuart & Mills SOLICITORS : (Plaintiff)
1978/98 Markham Geikie Garrugia (Plaintiff)
Patrick Grimes & Co (For all Defendants) CATCHWORDS : lack of contact; significance of ralationship; relevant circumstances under s 9(3)(d) scant evidence as to needs ACTS CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) CASES CITED : Arratoon v Arratoon (NSWSC, unreported 31 July 1995, Bryson J) Singer v Berghouse (NSWCA, unreported 23 July 1992) DECISION : See para 44
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate