NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : BAR-MORDECAI v HILLSTON & ORS [2000] NSWCA 120 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40553/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 December 1999, 1 February 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 May 2000
Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai - Claimant PARTIES : Alan David James Hillston - First Opponent Sue May Florence Choo and Robert John Cruikshanks - Second Opponents JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA; Stein JA; Giles JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT 3240/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Master McLaughlin JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : M J Bar-Mordecai - Claimant - In Person J B Whittle/B J Burke - Opponents SOLICITORS : Claimant - In person Shaw McDonald - Opponents CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - costs - where summons for leave to appeal filed incorrectly in Court of Appeal and claimant should have known appeal lay to single Judge in Equity - Summons dismissed as incompetent - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 Supreme Court Act 1970 CASES CITED: N/A DECISION : Application for leave to appeal is dismissed as incompetent; Claimant to pay costs of opponents incurred after 20 August 1999.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40553/99 ED 3240/98 SHELLER JA STEIN JA GILES JA
Tuesday, 16 May 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate