NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 10 BPR 18,495 [2001] NSW ConvR 55-961
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : M J Davis Industrial Pty Limited v Fairfield City Council & Anor [2000] NSWCA 287 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40701/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 September 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 October 2000
M J Davis Industrial Pty Limited (ACN 000 350 827) (Appellant) PARTIES : Fairfield City Council (First Respondent) Registrar General (Second Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1; Stein JA at 2; Fitzgerald JA at 31
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT AL 30068/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Bell J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
H R Sorensen (Appellant) COUNSEL : A J J Thompson (First Respondent) Submitting Appearance (Second Respondent) Roy P Ringrose (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Kencalo & Ritchie (First Respondent) Kenneth Charles Hall (Second Respondent) CATCHWORDS : PROPERTY - error in the plan - power of Registrar General to amend plan - conditional subdivision approval - public reserve condition - whether subdivision plan 'substantially in accordance' with deposited plan - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919; s 195H Local Government Act 1919; s 327(1)(d) Baiada Pty Limited v The Registrar General (1994) 6 BPR 13, 704 CASES CITED: Dobbie v Davidson (1991) 23 NSWLR 625 Quach v Marrickville Municipal Council (Nos 1 & 2) (1990) 22 NSWLR 55 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate