NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : South Sydney Council v Royal Botanic Gardens [1999] NSWCA 478 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40741/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 23-24 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 December 1999
South Sydney Council PARTIES : (Appellant) v Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Beazley JA at 52; Fitzgerald JA at 53
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 1539/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Hodgson J
COUNSEL : A: A J Meagher SC, P Brereton R: J G Gleeson SOLICITORS : A: Pike Pike & Fenwick R: Minter Ellison CATCHWORDS : Contracts; Construction and interpretation of lease; meaning of "may have regard to"; whether matters set out in clause exhaustive in determination of rent; rectification; specific performance. Local Government Act 1919 ACTS CITED : Royal Botanical Gardens & Domain Trust ACt 1980 Domain Leasing Act 1961 Thorby v Goldberg 112 CLR 597 Meehan v Jones 149 CLR 571 Hall v Busst 104 CLR 206 Van Der Waal v Goodenough (1983) 1 NSWLR 81 Booker Industries Pty Ltd v Wilson Parking (Qld) Pty Ltd 149 CLR 600 CASES CITED: Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd 185 CLR 410 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v SRA of NSW 194 CLR 338 Perry v Wright [1908] 1 KB 441 Bowtell v Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd 3 CLR 444 Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teoh 183 CLR 273 York Airconditionaing and Refrigeration (Aust) Pty Ltd v Commonwealth 80 CLR 11 Sebel Products Ltd v Commissioner of Customs and Excise [1949] Ch 409 DECISION : See orders
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate