NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 47 NSWLR 1 (2000) NSW ConvR 55-927
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Ta Ho Ma Pty Ltd v Allen [1999] NSWCA 202 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40235/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 1999
Ta Ho Ma Pty Limited PARTIES : v Christopher L Allen JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA; Giles JA; Sheppard AJA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 0414/97 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Raphael ADCJ
COUNSEL : A - G Rich R - CJ Bevan SOLICITORS : A - Bryan McCarthy, Dee Why R - Nikola Velcic & Associates, Parramatta CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - Economic loss - Valuer - Negligent valuation - Duty of care - Reasonable reliance - Whether valuation stale; VALUER - Negligence - Duty of care - Reasonable reliance - Whether valuation stale. Commercial Union Assurance Co of Aust Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Mutual Life & Citizens' Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt (1970) 122 CLR 556 Ultramares Corporation v Touche (1931) 255 NY 170 Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 R & G Mortgages Pty Ltd v Ronald A Newton & Associates Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of Victoria, 4 July 1997, unreported) CASES CITED: San Sebastian Pty Ltd v The Minister (1986) 162 CLR 340 Esanda Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 188 CLR 241 Smith v Bush [1990] 1 AC 831 Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 Kondis v State Transport Authority (1984) 154 CLR 672 Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Harris v Wyre Forest District Council [1990] 1 AC 831 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate