NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v GPP [2000] NSWCCA 181 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60302/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/12/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 May 2000
PARTIES : REGINA v GPP JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Hulme J at 2; Barr J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 96/61/0179 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Kirkham DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: R Ellis Appellant: R Greenhill QC/D Spears SOLICITORS : Crown: SE O'Connor Appellant: Gibsons CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - appellant convicted at four consecutive trials of sexual assaults on four children - whether jury directed appropriately - HELD: yes. - Criminal Law - appellant convicted at four consecutive trials of sexual assaults on four children - whether verdicts unreasonable - HELD: no. - Criminal Law - sentencing - sexual assaults on four children - whether sentences excessive - HELD: no. Aitchison v Director of Public Prosecutions (1996) 90 A Crim R 448 CASES CITED: R v JTS, Court of Criminal Appeal 25.5.98 unreported R v E (1996) 39 NSWLR 450 R v RNS [1999] NSWCCA 122 DECISION : Appeal dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence refused
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60302/98
DUNFORD J HULME J BARR J
Friday, 19 May 2000 R v GPP JUDGMENT
1 DUNFORD J: I agree with Barr J.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL No: 60302/98
DUNFORD J HULME J BARR J Friday, 19 May 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate