NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Alagha v Consumer Claims Tribunals & 2 Ors [1999] NSWSC 1139 revised - 03/12/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Administrative Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 30048/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 November 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 November 1999
Gabriel Michel Alagha (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : Consumer Claims Tribunals (First Defendant)
Jose and Marta Sergio (Second Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Consumer Claims Tribunal LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : BLI98/224 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Referee
Mr W S Veitch COUNSEL : (Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS : N/A CATCHWORDS : Consumer Claims Tribunals; Denial of natural justice Consumer Claims Tribunals Act (NSW) 1987 (as amended) ACTS CITED : Suitor's Fund Act (NSW) 1951 (as amended) Consumer Claims Act 1998 Hutley v Meigan & Ors (1997) ASC 65-370 Singer v Statutory and Other Officers Remuneration Tribunal (1986) 5 NSWLR 633 CASES CITED : Archcom Pty Limited v Consumer Claims Tribunal & Ors (NSWSC, 9 Septrember 1995, unreported) Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Judicial Review of Administrative Act 2nd ed DECISION : see para 22
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DIVISION
MASTER HARRISON
THURSDAY, 25 NOVEMBER 1999
30048/99 - GABRIEL MICHEL ALAGHA v CONSUMER CLAIMS TRIBUNALS & 2 ORS
JUDGMENT (Quash orders of Consumer Claims Tribunals;) denial of natural justice)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate