NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Commonwealth Development Bank v Windermere Pastoral [1999] NSWSC 518 revised - 31/08/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 12913/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 May 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 June 1999
PARTIES : Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia Limited - Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Windermere Pastoral Co Pty Limited - Defendant/Cross-Claimant JUDGMENT OF : Rolfe J
COUNSEL : Mr A.G. Bell - Plaintiff Mr I.E. Davidson - Defendant SOLICITORS : L.E. Taylor - Plaintiff Johnson & Sendall - Defendant CATCHWORDS : Application to strike out defence and cross-claim; Air Services Australia v Zarb (Court of Appeal - 26 August 1998 - unreported); Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1948-1949) 78 CLR 62 at p.91; General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) & Ors (1964) 112 CLR 125; Webster & Anor v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598; Wickstead & Ors v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; Esanda Finance Corporation Limited v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 188 CLR 241 and NRMA Insurance Limited v A.W. Edwards Pty Limited (Court of Appeal - 11 November 1994 - unreported) followed.; Fiduciary Duty; Beach Petroleum NL v Abbott Tout Russell Kennedy (1997) 26 ACSR 114; Commonwealth Bank of Australia & Anor v Smith (1991) 102 ALR 453; Maguire & Anor v Makaronis & Anor (1997) 188 CLR 449 and O'Halloran v R.T. Thomas & Family Pty Limited (1998) 45 NSWLR 262 noted.; Right of Guarantor to rely on defence available to principal debtor; Cellulose Products Pty Limited v Truda & Ors (1970) 92 WN 561; Langford Concrete Pty Limited v Finlay [1978] 1 NSWLR 14; Covino & Anor v Bandag Manufacturing Pty Limited [1983] 1 NSWLR 237; Indrisie v General Credits Limited [1985] VR 251 Re Kleiss & Anor ex parte Kleiss & Anor v Capt'n Snooze Pty Limited (1996) 61 FCR 436; Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Harvey [1994] ATPR 53640 considered.; Equitable Set-Off: depends on facts of each case; AWA Limited v Exicom Australia Pty Limited (1990) 19 NSWLR 705; Murphy & Anor v Zamonex Pty Limited & Ors (1993) 31 NSWLR 439; Direct Acceptance Corporation Limited (In Liquidation) v Lord (1993) 31 NSWLR 439 and, on appeal, (1993) 32 NSWLR 362; Coles Myer Limited v Liverpool Growers (Australasia) Pty Limited (Rolfe J -24 September 1993 - unreported); Wespac Banking Corporation v Nalty (Rolfe J - 8 October 1993 - unreported); Algons Engineering Pty Limited v Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited (Rolfe J - 1 August 1997 - unreported); Tooth & Co Limited v Rosier (Wood J - 7 June 1985 - unreported) and Tooth & Company Limited v Smith (Clarke J - 5 September 1984 - unreported) followed. DECISION : Application dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate