NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : REGINA v HINGST [1999] NSWCCA 335 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60047/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 01/07/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 October 1999
PARTIES : Alan Raymond HINGST Regina JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Dunford J at 2; Adams J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/31/0229 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Mitchelmore DCJ
COUNSEL : J V Agius SC (Appellant) L M B Lamprati (Crown) SOLICITORS : Harris Wheeler (Appellant) C K Smith (Crown) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW; Verdict unreasonable or not supported by evidence; delay between alleged offence and proceedings ACTS CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 R v Buckland [1977] 2 NSWLR 452 (Director of Public Prosecutions) Nauru v Fowler (1984) 154 CLR 627 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 CASES CITED: M v The Queen (1994) 184 CLR 487 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 Newland (1997) 98 ACrimR 455 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 73 ALJR 1 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 R v Giam (1999) NSWCCA 53 DECISION : Convictions quashed; Verdict of acquittal entered
- 31 - IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL
60047/99
SPIGELMAN CJ DUNFORD J ADAMS J
Wednesday 27 October 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate