NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Spiteri-v-Commonwealth of Australia [1999] NSWSC 567 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Civil FILE NUMBER(S) : 20466/1996 19/9/96 03/10/96 25/11/96 14/04/97 04/08/97 18/08/97 15/09/97 09/10/97 19/12/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/3/98 24/4/98 18/05/98 06/07/98 17/08/94 28/09/98 12/10/98 27/11/98 18/03/99 02/06/99 11/06/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 1999
PARTIES : Jospeph Spiteri-v-Commonwealth of Australia JUDGMENT OF : McInerney J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 020466/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : McInerney A/J
COUNSEL : For the Plaintiff; Mr.De Burg For the Defendant: Mr Rundale For the Plaintiff: Astley Thompson & Valtas SOLICITORS : For the Defendant: Mr Curtis of Australian Goverment Solicitor For the Defendant: CATCHWORDS : CASES CITED : Brisbane South Regional Authority -v-Taylor 1996 (186) CLR page 541 Sydney Council -v-Zegarac 1998 (43) NSW LR page 195 DECISION : I therefore make order (2) in the Notice of Motion.; I grant leave to the parties to further mention the matter to make any further orders sought.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate