NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 50 NSWLR 89
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NSW Land and Housing Corporation v Stannard & Anor [2000] NSWSC 681 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Administrative Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30087/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 July 2000
New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (Plaintiff)
v PARTIES : Carol Ann Stannard (First Defendant)
Residential Tribunal (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Davies AJ
LOWER COURT Residential Tribunal JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03221/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Member, K Thane JUDICIAL OFFICER :
P: Mr J M Atkin COUNSEL : 1D: Ms J A Needham 2D: Submitting Appearance P: Michael Callen SOLICITORS : 1D: Terrence Anthony Murphy 2D: I V Knight CATCHWORDS : Residential Tenancies - whether rent increased - whether notice of increase to tenant - whether notation on rent card a sufficient notice LEGISLATION CITED : Residential Tribunal Act 1998, ss 27, 62 Residential Tenancies Act 1987, ss 8-10, 44-46, 130 CASES CITED : Moses v Lovegrove [1952] 2 QB 533 DECISION : Dismissed with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DIVISION
DAVIES AJ
14 JULY 2000 30087/99 - NEW SOUTH WALES LAND AND HOUSING CORPORATION v Carol Ann STANNARD & ANOR JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: This is an appeal brought under s 62 of the Residential Tribunal Act, 1998 from a decision of the Residential Tribunal ("the Tribunal") given on 27 September 1999. 2 The appeal is limited to a question of law. Section 62(2) provides:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate