NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Sanwa Australia Finance Ltd v Finchill Pty Ltd, GIO Finance Ltd v Finchill Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 466 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40340/00; 40341/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2001
Sanwa Australia Finance Limited PARTIES : GIO Finance Limited Finchill Pty Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Heydon JA at 2; Davies AJA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 7944/98; 6837/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Balla ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: M Cashion SC/T M Thawley Respondent: P Finch SOLICITORS : Appellant: Kemp Strang Respondent: James A Moustacas & Co CATCHWORDS : Conversion - Unjust Enrichment - Cheques LEGISLATION CITED : Cheques Act 1986 Hunter BNZ Finance Ltd v C G Maloney Pty Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 420 National Australia Bank Ltd v KDS Construction Services Pty Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 668 CASES CITED: Orix Australia Corporation Ltd v M Wright Hotel Refrigeration Pty Ltd (2000) 155 FLR 267 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68 DECISION : Appeals allowed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40340/00; DC 7944/98 CA 40341/00; DC 6837/98 BEAZLEY JA HEYDON JA DAVIES AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate