NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Tubou [2001] NSWCCA 243 revised - 09/07/2001 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60809/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 May 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Jonacani Tubou JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 81; Sully J at 82
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : DC 00/21/0159 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Phegan DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr S J Odgers SC (Appellant) Ms D M L M Woodburne (Respondent) SOLICITORS : D J Humphreys (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Appeal against conviction - Sexual Assault - Whether conviction unreasonable - Whether miscarriage of justice - Whether combination of matters created unreasonable conviction - Sufficiency of corroboration - Significance of inconsistencies between testimony of complainant and other evidence - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) - Criminal Law and Procedure - Judicial directions to jury - Sexual Assault - Whether directions to jury on delay of complaint regarding sexual assault satisfactory - Whether miscarriage of justice - Effect of delay on credit - Whether relevant "delay" occurred - Where no objection taken to directions at trial - Whether leave should be granted to allow ground of appeal - Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4. - Evidence - Sexual Assault - Admissibility of evidence of prior sexual activity of complainant with person other than accused - Whether evidence should have been admitted - Whether probative value of evidence outweighed potential distress, humiliation and embarrassment - Whether exclusion of evidence rendered conviction unsafe and caused miscarriage of justice - Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 105 - D Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Berrigan v R (unreported, 23 November 1995, High Court of Australia) Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 M v R (1994) 184 CLR 487 CASES CITED: R v Flannery [1969] VR 586 R v DJK (1997) 96 A Crim R 443 R v Kalajzich (1989) 39 A Crim R 415 R v Wayne (1984) 14 A Crim R 391 R v Zorad (1990) 47 A Crim R 211 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate