NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors; Idoport Pty Ltd & Market Holdings Pty Ltd v Donald Robert Argus; Idoport Pty Ltd "JMG" v National Australia Bank Limited [27] [2001] NSWSC 509 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50113/98; 50026/99; 3991/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 15/06/01, 18/06/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 June 2001
Idoport Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : National Australia Bank Limited (Defendant) Donald Robert Argus (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : Mr M Dicker, Mr R Alkadamani (Plaintiff) Mr T Bathurst QC, Mr H Insall (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Withnell Hetherington (Plaintiff) Freehills (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Practice & Procedure - Application for leave to amend LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules Clough v Rogers (1974) 48 ALJR 481 Cropper v Smith (188 4) 26 CH D 700 per Bowen LJ Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2000] NSWSC 1141 Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2001] NSWSC 123 Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2001] NSWSC 142 CASES CITED : Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2001] NSWSC 328 Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2001] NSWSC 485 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251 Secured Income Real Estate (Aust) Ltd v St Martin's Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596 State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 189 CLR 146 Trego v Hunt [1896] AC 7, DECISION : Leave to amend to be allowed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate