NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 120 A Crim R 209
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v TJF [2001] NSWCCA 127 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60517/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 2001
PARTIES : Regina v TJF JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Studdert J at 2; Sperling J at 73
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/21/1024 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Mitchelmore DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P. Hock (Crown) J.W. Fliece (Appellant) SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor (Crown) Hovan & Co (Appellant) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - trial by jury - indictment charging commission of sexual offences - whether counsel's conduct incompetent and, if so, whether miscarriage of justice. EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINT - failure to direct that such evidence may be unreliable - whether good reasons for judge declining to warn - consideration of warning required - Evidence Act, s 165. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act Criminal Appeal Act De Jesus v The Queen (1986) 61 ALJR 1 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 R v Truong (1996) 86 A Crim R 188 R v PAH (unreported, NSWCCA, 18 December 1988) CASES CITED: R v Gillard (1999) 105 A Crim R 479 R v Ali [2000] NSWCCA 177 R v Mayberry [2000] NSWCCA 531 R v Beattie (1996) 40 NSWLR 155 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Stanton (unreported, NSWCCA, 24 July 1998) R v Flood [1999] NSWCCA 198 DECISION : Appeal against conviction allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; judgment and verdict of acquittal entered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate