NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v David John McIntyre [2001] NSWSC 311 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70041/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/03/01 - 24/4/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 April 2001
PARTIES : Crown David John McIntyre JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr N. Harrison (Crown) Mr P. Segal (Accused) SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor (Crown) Hugo Schleiger & Associates (Accused) CATCHWORDS : Voir Dire hearing - Admissibility of opinion evidence as to results of DNA testing using Profiler Plus system LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Daubert v Merrell, Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc 509 US 579 Frye v United States, 293 Fed, 1013 (1923) H G v The Queen [1999] HCA 2 CASES CITED : R v Gilmore [1977] 2 NSWLR 935 R v Karger [2001] SASC 64 Regina v Milat (unreported) NSW SC, 12 June 1996 R v Pantoja (1996) 88 ACR 554 DECISION : Evidence admitted
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES CRIMINAL DIVISION
BELL J
LISMORE: WEDNESDAY 11 APRIL 2001
REGINA v DAVID JOHN McINTYRE
JUDGMENT: On admissibility of evidence; see page T905. HER HONOUR: 1. Mr Segal objects to the admission of opinion evidence from Robert Goetz as to the results of DNA testing conducted upon various items, including samples taken from the stained foam mattress located at the accused's home, the carpet located in the second bedroom of the accused's home, the carpet found in the boot of the accused's Chrysler Scorpion sedan and the Guthrie's card relating to Luke Gregory.
2. In each instance the DNA analysis was conducted by means of the Profiler Plus system. Profiler Plus is the commercial name given to a system marketed by Applied Biosystems, a United States company.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate