NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) 116 A Crim R 536
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Toki (No. 3) [2000] NSWSC 999 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70001/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2000
PARTIES : R v Martin Marino Toki JUDGMENT OF : Howie J
COUNSEL : R.F Greenwood QC (Accused) C. Maxwell QC (Crown) SOLICITORS : Ross Hill and Associates (Accused) SE O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : Evidence - admissibility and relevance - relationship evidence - hearsay evidence LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 - ss 65, 72, 97, 101, 135, 136, 137 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 Wilson v the Queen (1970) 123 CLR 334 S v The Queen (1989) 186 CLR 266 R v Frawley (1993) 69 A Crim R 208 R v Serratorre (1999) 48 NSWLR 101 Conway v R (2000) 172 ALR 185 Pfennig v The Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461 R v Ritter (unreported, CCA(NSW), 31/8/95) R v Anderson (2000) 111 A Crim R 19 R v Blick [2000] NSWCCA 61 R v Locke (1997) 91 A Crim R 356 CASES CITED : R v Vollmer [1996] 1 VR 95 R v Hissey (1973) 6 SASR 280 R v Matthews (1990) 58 SASR 19 R v Frawley (1990) 69 A Crim R 208 Shaw v The Queen (1952) 85 CLR 365 R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 453 R v NJF (unreported, CCA(NSW), 5/6/97) Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 Ordukaya v Hicks [2000] NSWCA 180 R v Singh-Bal (1997) 92 A Crim R 397 R v Dean (unreported, 12/3/97) R v Mankotia [1998] NSWSC 295 R v Polkinghorne [1999] NSWSC 704 DECISION : Evidence admitted
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate