NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : McCarthy v Kidd [2001] NSWCA 304 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40871/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 August 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 September 2001
Barbara Ann McCarthy (Appellant) PARTIES : Iain Harrison Kidd (First Respondent) Hunter Area Health Service (Second Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1; Heydon JA at 2; Studdert J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 4717/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Rolfe DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr S G Campbell (under pro bono scheme) (Appellant) Mr J P Gormly (Respondents) SOLICITORS : Appellant litigant in person Tress Cocks & Maddox (Respondents) CATCHWORDS : Torts - Negligence - Medical Negligence - Failure to warn - Role of medical evidence from specific practitioners in relation to Court's own assessment of necessity for warning and content of warning - Subjective and hypothetical nature of question as to whether patient would have heeded warning - Torts- Negligence - Medical Negligence - Causation - Appeal from trial judge's finding that no causation proved - Whether iron injections caused gluteal fibrosis - Where medical evidence was controversial - Where the trial judge observed the plaintiff give evidence and found her to be a poor historian - ND Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582; (1957) 2 All ER 118 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 CASES CITED: Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1992-93) 177 CLR 472 Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 178 ALR 577 Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) AC 871 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate