NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 38 ACSR 307 (2001) 19 ACLC 696
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MANN & ANOR v. SANGRIA P/L [2001] NSWSC 172 revised - 2/05/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4062/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 08/03/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2001
JOHN MANN (2nd Pltf) PARTIES : G.A. COONEY HOLDINGS PTY LTD (IN LIQ) (3rd Pltf) SANGRIA P/L (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
COUNSEL : R.D. Marshall - Pltf; K. Andronos - Dft SOLICITORS : Gordon & Johnstone - Pltf Mallesons Stephen Jaques - Dft CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - external administration - voidable transactions - preferential payments - Abattoir sold meat to wholesale Butcher August 1996 to March 1997 then sued to recover $186,000 unpaid account - action settled on terms that debt paid off at $7000 per month - six instalments paid in period January to June 1998 - in May and June 1998 Abattoir sold and delivered six consignments of meat which were each paid for by a cheque specifically for the price of one consignment - cheques postdated 2 or 3 weeks and handed over at or forwarded soon after delivery total $27811.58 - voluntary administration on 22 June followed by winding-up - company insolvent throughout 6 months preceding VA - on claim under subs.588FA(1) to recover payments, instalments off old debt $42,000 were held to be preferences - payments $27,811.58 for deliveries in May and June were held not to fall within subs.588FA(1) as the transactions were not preferential - consideration of categorisation of facts and events as transaction within the meaning of subs.588FA(1) - defence under s.588FG(2) failed because of grounds for suspicion of insolvency - consideration of Dye v. Peninsula Hotels (Ormiston JA) VR Dye & Co. v. Peninsula Hotel (in Liq) & Anor [1999] 3 VR 201; [1999] 32 ACSR 27 Richardson v. Commercial Banking Co. of Sydney Ltd (1952) 85 CLR 110 CASES CITED : Airservices Australia v. Ferrier (1996) 185 CLR 483 Nilant v. Borden Australia Pty Ltd (FCA 26/6/96 Hill J) Queensland Bacon Proprietary Limited v. Rees (1966) 115 CLR 266 DECISION : Judgment for the plaintiff for $42,000 plus interest.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate