NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Broken Hill Proprietary Company Ltd v Zunic & ors [2001] NSWSC 561 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11353/2001; 11354/2001; 11425/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 May 2001; 11 May 2001; 21 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 July 2001
Broken Hill Proprietary Company Ltd t/as Whyalla Ship Building & Engineering Works v Zunic & 3 ors PARTIES : Wallaby Grip Ltd & anor. v Zunic & 2 ors. Amaca Pty Limited (formerly James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited) v Zunic & 3 ors JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1
B. Walker SC/D. Graham (1st and 3rd Applicants) COUNSEL : C. Birch SC/A. Scotting (2nd Applicants) J. W. Shaw QC/J. L. Sharpe (Defendants) Piper Alderman - BHP SOLICITORS : Middletons, Moore & Bevins - Wallaby Grip Phillips Fox - Amaca Turner Freeman - Defendants LEGISLATION CITED : Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW) Bankinvest AG v Seabrook (1988) 14 NSWLR 711 Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry (2000) 50 NSWLR 357 CASES CITED : Hayward v Barratt & anor (2000) NSWSC 708 (11 July 2000) Hearn v Commonwealth [2000] NSWDDT 12 (6 December 2000) Distillers Co. (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson [1971] AC 458 at 468E Goliath Portland Cement Co. Ltd v Bengtell & anor. (1994) 33 NSWLR 414 at 419 DECISION : In each of the three present applications, the summons is dismissed with costs
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
SULLY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate